Dad On Retire
  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Email Whitelisting
  • Home
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Thank you
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock
No Result
View All Result
Dad On Retire
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Rand Paul smacks down bipartisan TikTok ban bills: ‘Goes against the First Amendment’

DadOnRetire by DadOnRetire
March 29, 2023
in News
0
Rand Paul smacks down bipartisan TikTok ban bills: ‘Goes against the First Amendment’
0
SHARES
5
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

FIRST ON FOX: Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., broke from his Senate GOP colleagues on Tuesday over their opposition to TikTok, arguing that banning the popular social media app ‘goes against the First Amendment.’

‘I think it’s a really bad idea. And people need to ask themselves, ‘Why does the Chinese government ban TikTok, and do we want to emulate the Chinese government?’ So, I think it’s a mistake,’ Paul told Fox News Digital after weekly Senate lunches. ‘If you ban a social media platform, you know, I don’t know if you get any clearer that that goes against the First Amendment.’

There are currently two bipartisan Senate bills aimed at banning TikTok, a video app that exploded in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic but has raised alarms over its connection to the Chinese Communist Party.

While congressional Democrats are divided on whether TikTok should be handled as a national security threat, Republicans have nearly all gotten on board with curbing it – save for at least one notable exception.

Asked why he’s opposed to a bill introduced by Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., and John Thune, R-S.D., that would give the president a pathway to banning TikTok, Paul replied, ‘I’m for the First Amendment to the Constitution, which says that companies that operate in the United States, we shouldn’t limit their speech or people who try to broadcast speech on those platforms.’

He shared similar sentiments about an earlier bill introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., that would outright ban the app from operating in the U.S.: ‘Any bills that name a particular organization have a constitutional problem … not allowed to write a specific law against a person or a company. The First Amendment also requires the government to stay out of regulating speech or preventing speech.’

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified before a House of Representatives panel last week. He repeatedly denied that the app’s parent company, ByteDance, part of which is owned by China’s authoritarian government, allows Beijing to spy on American users’ data.

Paul pointed out that precedent shows that banning the social media app may not work out.

‘The courts have already struck that down when the Trump administration tried to ban TikTok,’ Paul said. ‘It was struck down.’

Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS

FIRST ON FOX: Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., broke from his Senate GOP colleagues on Tuesday over their opposition to TikTok, arguing that banning the popular social media app ‘goes against the First Amendment.’

‘I think it’s a really bad idea. And people need to ask themselves, ‘Why does the Chinese government ban TikTok, and do we want to emulate the Chinese government?’ So, I think it’s a mistake,’ Paul told Fox News Digital after weekly Senate lunches. ‘If you ban a social media platform, you know, I don’t know if you get any clearer that that goes against the First Amendment.’

There are currently two bipartisan Senate bills aimed at banning TikTok, a video app that exploded in popularity during the COVID-19 pandemic but has raised alarms over its connection to the Chinese Communist Party.

While congressional Democrats are divided on whether TikTok should be handled as a national security threat, Republicans have nearly all gotten on board with curbing it – save for at least one notable exception.

Asked why he’s opposed to a bill introduced by Sens. Mark Warner, D-Va., and John Thune, R-S.D., that would give the president a pathway to banning TikTok, Paul replied, ‘I’m for the First Amendment to the Constitution, which says that companies that operate in the United States, we shouldn’t limit their speech or people who try to broadcast speech on those platforms.’

He shared similar sentiments about an earlier bill introduced by Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla., that would outright ban the app from operating in the U.S.: ‘Any bills that name a particular organization have a constitutional problem … not allowed to write a specific law against a person or a company. The First Amendment also requires the government to stay out of regulating speech or preventing speech.’

TikTok CEO Shou Zi Chew testified before a House of Representatives panel last week. He repeatedly denied that the app’s parent company, ByteDance, part of which is owned by China’s authoritarian government, allows Beijing to spy on American users’ data.

Paul pointed out that precedent shows that banning the social media app may not work out.

‘The courts have already struck that down when the Trump administration tried to ban TikTok,’ Paul said. ‘It was struck down.’

Elizabeth Elkind is a politics reporter for Fox News Digital. 

This post appeared first on FOX NEWS
Previous Post

Michigan AG Nessel says income tax cut temporary

Next Post

Sen. Kennedy surprises Mayorkas by interrupting testimony for shoulder pat, handshake after tense exchange

DadOnRetire

DadOnRetire

Next Post
Sen. Kennedy surprises Mayorkas by interrupting testimony for shoulder pat, handshake after tense exchange

Sen. Kennedy surprises Mayorkas by interrupting testimony for shoulder pat, handshake after tense exchange

Get the daily email that makes reading the news actually enjoyable. Stay informed and entertained, for free.
Your information is secure and your privacy is protected. By opting in you agree to receive emails from us. Remember that you can opt-out any time, we hate spam too!
  • Trending
  • Comments
  • Latest
AG threatens to sue nonprofit accused of going woke if taxpayer money isn’t returned: ‘Choice is yours’

AG threatens to sue nonprofit accused of going woke if taxpayer money isn’t returned: ‘Choice is yours’

February 10, 2023
Arkansas Democrat defends Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders amid attack from California’s Gavin Newsom

Arkansas Democrat defends Gov. Sarah Huckabee Sanders amid attack from California’s Gavin Newsom

February 9, 2023
Trump gears up for 2024 rally in Waco, Texas amid ongoing federal investigation, possible NY indictment

Trump gears up for 2024 rally in Waco, Texas amid ongoing federal investigation, possible NY indictment

March 19, 2023

Here’s why every American should be talking about politics and religion on Thanksgiving

November 23, 2023
US military bases that housed Afghan evacuees suffered $260 million in damage

US military bases that housed Afghan evacuees suffered $260 million in damage

0
George Santos scandal brings renewed attention to Biden’s fabrications

George Santos scandal brings renewed attention to Biden’s fabrications

0
Texas ranch owner near border catches men attempting to break into house

Texas ranch owner near border catches men attempting to break into house

0
Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin diagnosed with ‘serious but curable’ cancer

Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin diagnosed with ‘serious but curable’ cancer

0
‘Not constitutional’: Congress invokes new War Powers Resolution to reject Trump’s strikes on Iran

‘Not constitutional’: Congress invokes new War Powers Resolution to reject Trump’s strikes on Iran

June 22, 2025
At UN Security Council, Israel’s ambassador slams Iranian hypocrisy

At UN Security Council, Israel’s ambassador slams Iranian hypocrisy

June 22, 2025
Watch: Bernie Sanders reacts to Trump’s Iran strikes in real time at ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ rally

Watch: Bernie Sanders reacts to Trump’s Iran strikes in real time at ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ rally

June 22, 2025
Expert confident Iran’s nuclear program is ‘no longer’ after massive US strike

Expert confident Iran’s nuclear program is ‘no longer’ after massive US strike

June 22, 2025

Recent News

‘Not constitutional’: Congress invokes new War Powers Resolution to reject Trump’s strikes on Iran

‘Not constitutional’: Congress invokes new War Powers Resolution to reject Trump’s strikes on Iran

June 22, 2025
At UN Security Council, Israel’s ambassador slams Iranian hypocrisy

At UN Security Council, Israel’s ambassador slams Iranian hypocrisy

June 22, 2025
Watch: Bernie Sanders reacts to Trump’s Iran strikes in real time at ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ rally

Watch: Bernie Sanders reacts to Trump’s Iran strikes in real time at ‘Fighting Oligarchy’ rally

June 22, 2025
Expert confident Iran’s nuclear program is ‘no longer’ after massive US strike

Expert confident Iran’s nuclear program is ‘no longer’ after massive US strike

June 22, 2025

Disclaimer: DadOnRetire.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

  • About us
  • Contacts
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Email Whitelisting

Copyright © 2025 dadonretire.com | All Rights Reserved

No Result
View All Result
  • Economy
  • Editor’s Pick
  • Investing
  • Stock

Copyright © 2025 dadonretire.com | All Rights Reserved